# Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 43.2 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 84.4% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 341 | 112 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1244 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1403 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | 143.98 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1407 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.