# Gemma 2 9B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 2 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 36.4% for Gemma 2 9B and 20.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 334 | 301 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | 22.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | 13.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.0 vs 28.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.