# Gemma 2 9B vs o1-pro

> o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-o1-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.3 to 9.7.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 334 | 264 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $150 |
| Output $/M | — | $600 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than o1-pro?

o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.