# Gemma 2 9B vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 37.7 to 9.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 334 | 177 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1410 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1405 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1386 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1396 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.