# Gemma 2 9B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.1 to 9.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 334 | 137 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1392 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.