# Gemma 2 9B vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 35.1 to 9.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 341 | 227 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1250 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1254 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.