# Gemma 2 9B vs Llama 13b

> Gemma 2 9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 2 9B leads 57.6 to 36.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 341 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 683 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | 100.58 |
| PIQA | 83.7% | 80.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 838 |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | 20.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | 85.7% | 78.7% |
| MMLU | 72.1% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1190 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 753 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Llama 13b?

Gemma 2 9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemma 2 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Llama 13b share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.