# Gemma 2 9B vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 334 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1429 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1439 |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.