# Gemma 2 9B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-hunyuan-standard
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.6 to 9.7.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 37.2 |
| Rank | 334 | 193 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1270 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1264 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1245 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1301 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.