# Gemma 2 9B vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 53.1 |
| Rank | 341 | 37 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1413 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | 153.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 98.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 92.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1422 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1393 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Grok 4.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.