# Gemma 2 9B vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 66.8 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 334 | 19 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1464 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1620 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1445 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | 156.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1416 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1463 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1425 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1431 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1453 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1430 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Grok 4.6 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.