# Gemma 2 9B vs GLM-5

> GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-glm-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5 leads 52.3 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 80% for GLM-5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 46.1 |
| Rank | 341 | 66 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 69.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 48.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.62 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 52.4% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 73.7% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 86.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,432 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1452 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | 145.83 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 44.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 80% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1440 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 65.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 16.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 87.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1454 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.1% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1423 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1428 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1446 |
| CL-bench | — | 18.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1446 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1439 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | 1601 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1456 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than GLM-5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or GLM-5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and GLM-5 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.