# Gemma 2 9B vs GLM-5.3-Flash

> GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-glm-5-3-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 58.4 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 93.9% for GLM-5.3-Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 49.6 |
| Rank | 334 | 45 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1506 |
| DeepSWE | — | 63.4% |
| FrontierCode | — | 31.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1614 |
| SciCode | — | 51.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 303.55 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 52.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1490 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | 151.9 |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 93.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 90.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1512 |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1462 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1495 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1420 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1480 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1479 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1471 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 36.