# Gemma 2 9B vs GLM-5.1

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-glm-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 55.0 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 93.3% for GLM-5.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 47.6 |
| Rank | 334 | 51 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- GLM-5.1: 48.5 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1486 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 43.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 57.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 887.1 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- GLM-5.1: 24.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 40.9% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,634 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- GLM-5.1: 38.2 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1472 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | 149.86 |
| SimpleBench | — | 55.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 77.7% |
| CritPt | — | 4.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- GLM-5.1: 49.0 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1472 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 33.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 89.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1477 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- GLM-5.1: 55.2 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1448 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1516 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1478 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1436 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1423 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1453 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1467 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- GLM-5.1: 76.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1451 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1467 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- GLM-5.1: 67.2 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1462 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1454 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | 1592 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1473 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and GLM-5.1 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.