# Gemma 2 9B vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.5 to 9.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 341 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1354 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1332 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.