# Gemma 2 9B vs GLM-4.5

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-glm-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5 leads 39.0 to 9.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 341 | 122 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1429 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1427 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1433 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.3% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1415 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1414 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1412 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1395 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1415 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and GLM-4.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.