# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 29.9.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 248 | 43 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1457 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.24 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1465 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1438 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.