# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 36.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 244 | 72 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1488 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1483 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1473 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1489 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.