# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 36.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 244 | 105 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1243 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1404 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.