# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.6 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 244 | 270 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1107 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1066 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1061 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.8 vs 31.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.