# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 6 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.3 to 11.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 244 | 282 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1148 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.8 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.