# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 248 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.