# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 47.8 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 248 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1269 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen Max better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.