# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen-14B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.6 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 244 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen-14B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.