# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.4 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 244 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1272 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.