# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Small 3.1

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-mistral-small-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 14.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 31.7 |
| Rank | 248 | 269 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.56 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1309 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1278 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1262 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1257 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1253 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1283 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1299 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1277 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1253 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1270 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.