# Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.3 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 201 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1350 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1336 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1332 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1362 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.