# Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 36.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 248 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.