# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 30.1 to 12.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 244 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 3-70B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.