# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.6 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 244 | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1095 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1126 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1090 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1017 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 949 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 3.2 3B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.