# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 20.5 to 12.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 244 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1046 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 2-13B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.