# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 13b

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 248 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 13b?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.