# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

> Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-kimi-k2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 134 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.57 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1399 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 597.5 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1384 |
| SimpleBench | — | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.02 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1363 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1379 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1386 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1324 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1384 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1383 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1347 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1349 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1666 |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.