# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 244 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.