# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 29.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 248 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.