# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 248 | 114 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1399 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1395 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.