# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4

> Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-grok-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 34.2.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 244 | 49 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.46 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1211 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1376 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1412 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.