# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.3 to 20.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 244 | 19 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1464 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1620 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1445 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.48 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1416 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1463 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1425 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1431 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1453 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1430 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1422 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.6 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.