# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.1 to 36.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 45.5 |
| Rank | 244 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1458 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1441 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1445 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1430 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.