# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 248 | 134 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1435 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1422 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1417 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1437 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.