# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.1 Fast

> Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-grok-4-1-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 20.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 131 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1241 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1407 |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1398 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1416 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1347 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1411 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.