# Gemma 2 2b IT vs GPT-6 Luna

> GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-gpt-6-luna
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Luna leads 54.7 to 31.8.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 45.1 |
| Rank | 244 | 65 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1448 |
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1583 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1415 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1458 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1417 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1400 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GPT-6 Luna share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.