# Gemma 2 2b IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-glm-4-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.7-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 32.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 244 | 175 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1383 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1354 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1357 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 60.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1336 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1333 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1327 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.