# Gemma 2 2b IT vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 36.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 248 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1368 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1371 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GLM-4.6V share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.