# Gemma 2 2b IT vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.7 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 244 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1347 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1353 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1353 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1304 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1338 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1299 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1335 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1305 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1333 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.