# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Gemma 7B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 248 | 299 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1042 |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Gemma 7B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Gemma 7B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.