# Gemma 2 2b IT vs Gemma 3 4B

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-2b-it-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 11.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 28.1 |
| Rank | 248 | 326 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1230 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 2b IT: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1253 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 50.9% |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.02 |

## Math

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1239 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1273 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1271 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1255 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Gemma 3 4B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.