# Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 18.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.4% for Gemma 2 27B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 302 | 152 |
| Context | 8K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.