# Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen2-72B

> Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2-72B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 27.9% for Gemma 2 27B and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 302 | 294 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 54% |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | 125.27 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 82.4% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1195 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Qwen2-72B?

Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2-72B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.