# Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 24.9 to 19.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 27.9% for Gemma 2 27B and 56.1% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 312 | 297 |
| Context | 8K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 52.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | 56.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 46.1% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.